What Is Value at Risk (VaR)? How to Calculate It

Traders and investors with significant cash and assets on the line always have a common question in mind: What could possibly go wrong? 

Enter Value at Risk (VaR), a powerful metric that goes beyond statistics to offer a forward-looking window and provide insights into what might go awry. VaR can be useful —especially if you’re particularly interested in bear markets.

In this guide, we'll unravel the intricacies of VaR, including its definition and methods to calculate it.

What is Value at Risk (VaR)?

VaR is a financial metric widely used by many investors to guide their thinking about risk management. More specifically, it’s a statistical measure that offers a glimpse into the potential financial losses a portfolio might encounter over a specified timeframe and at a certain confidence level. 

But the VaR metric doesn't just analyze past performance. In fact, it extends its reach into the future, providing investors and institutions with a quantifiable estimate of the maximum loss they might face. 

In short, by incorporating statistical methods and market data, VaR becomes an indispensable tool for decision-makers, allowing them to manage and respond to complex financial risks with more certainty than they otherwise might have. 

Pros and cons of Value at Risk

Like every tool and metric, VaR comes with its own set of benefits and drawbacks.

VaR pros

Quantitative risk measurement

VaR provides a numerical measure of potential financial losses within a specified confidence level and time horizon. This crucial quantitative aspect allows businesses and investors to gauge their exposure to market risk, helping them make informed decisions and devise strategies.

Standardized risk assessment

VaR facilitates standardized risk assessment, enabling organizations to uniformly evaluate risk-return trade-offs associated with various investment strategies. This is important because it allows managers to diversify their overall portfolios effectively and allocate capital intelligently. In other words, standardization enhances comparability and simplifies the evaluation of different assets or portfolios consistently.

Scenario analysis and stress testing

VaR also allows risk-minded individuals to perform scenario analysis and stress testing. It lets businesses assess their portfolios’ performance under various scenarios by simulating different market conditions. This feature is invaluable for preparing for unexpected market events, even “black swans.” It equips organizations with the data to design risk management strategies tailored to specific economic conditions. 

Learn how to backtest your next trade with Composer. Grab a free 14-day trial today.

VaR cons

Assumption of normality

A significant drawback of VaR is its assumption that financial asset returns follow a normal distribution. This may not hold true, especially during extreme market conditions. Financial markets are subject to occasional bouts of extreme volatility and events that deviate from a normal distribution. VaR's reliance on this assumption can lead to underestimation of risks during turbulent periods.

Lack of context

VaR, while providing a numerical measure of risk, often lacks context. For example, it doesn’t offer insights into the specific factors driving the risk, which can challenge risk managers attempting to develop detailed risk mitigation strategies. 

VaR also doesn’t provide enough context itself––additional qualitative analysis and an understanding of the market dynamics are essential to make safe decisions.

Tail risk disregard

By focusing on the central portion of the probability distribution, VaR may significantly underestimate the risk of rare but extreme events called tail risks. These events, although unlikely, can have a devastating impact on a portfolio. Since VaR is typically calculated for a specific confidence interval (like 95% or 99%), it doesn’t account for the severity of losses that could occur beyond this threshold. This limitation can lead to a false sense of security and inadequate risk preparedness.

What is the VaR formula?

The VaR formula calculates the potential loss in a portfolio’s value at a specific confidence level over a defined time horizon. The formula is often represented as:

VaR=μ+Z×σ

With:

• μ the expected return or mean

• Z the Z-score, representing the number of standard deviations

• σ the standard deviation of the portfolio's returns

The Z-score is derived from a standard normal distribution table and corresponds to the chosen confidence level. For example, a 95% confidence level might correspond to a Z-score of 1.65.

To use the VaR formula, multiply the Z-score by the standard deviation (σ) and add the result to the expected return (μ). This provides an estimate of the potential loss at the specified confidence level. 

For instance, if the 95% VaR is $100, it implies a 5% chance of experiencing losses beyond $100 over the defined time horizon.

VaR calculation methods

Now that you know the formula to calculate VaR, let’s explore the methods. Here are a few ways to calculate VaR:

Historical method

The historical method is a straightforward approach based on historical price movements. It comes down to analyzing past returns and identifying worst-case scenarios over a given period. This method, while simple, assumes that future market conditions will resemble historical patterns, neglecting the possibility of structural changes in markets and "black swan" scenarios. This is a frequent method when it comes to evaluating bond portfolios, with examples of bond portfolios, including popular ETFs like SPLB, SPMB, and MEAR.

The variance-covariance method

Also called the parametric method, the variance-covariance method calculates VaR by estimating the mean and standard deviation of the asset returns. Using these parameters, the VaR is derived by considering the normal distribution of returns. This method is efficient for liquid and normally distributed assets but may be less accurate for assets with non-normal distributions or during high market volatility.

Monte Carlo simulation

In the Monte Carlo simulation, analysts typically use computers to generate numerous random scenarios to model the range of potential outcomes for a portfolio. Each scenario considers various factors influencing asset prices, such as volatility and correlation. By running simulations, the method estimates the distribution of portfolio returns, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of potential losses. 

The simulation is particularly useful for complex portfolios with what might be termed non-linear dependencies and when distributions of asset returns aren’t easily defined or readily identifiable.

Overall, your choice of method depends on factors such as the nature of your assets, the profile’s complexity, and your desired level of accuracy. But why limit yourself to just one method or to one simple VaR sheet? In professional finance, risk managers often use a combination of these methods to gain a more comprehensive view of potential risks.

Explore the world of Value at Risk analytics with Composer

Composer is the ultimate no-code solution for automated trading. Unlike traditional platforms, Composer positions you to harness the power of VaR without the complexities of coding. Dive into risk management, predict potential losses in your portfolio, and make data-driven decisions effortlessly. With Composer, not only can you actively trade with ease, but you can also refine and perfect your trading algorithms behind the scenes. 

Seize the opportunity to transform your trading journey by signing up for Composer today. Simply head to composer.trade and get started with your 14-day free trial.