Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

AGG vs. QQQ

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

AGG
$--
vs

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

QQQ
$--

Correlation

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with AGG:
Compare:
AGG
Correlation
With:
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
SwitchBNDVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF1.00SCHZSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF0.99EAGGiShares Trust - iShares ESG Aware U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.99SPABSPDR Series Trust - SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF0.99BKAGBNY Mellon ETF Trust - BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF0.99AVIGAmerican Century ETF Trust - Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF0.99IUSBBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF0.98BIVVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF0.98FLCBFranklin Templeton ETF Trust - Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF0.98BBAGJ.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF0.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by AGG and QQQ:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with AGG
Learn more about QQQ
AGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

What is AGG?

The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance before fees and expenses of the total United States investment grade bond market as defined by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.

Snapshot
**

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Inception date
Sep 22 2003
Mar 10 1999
Expense ratio
0.03%
0.20%
AGG has a lower expense ratio than QQQ by 0.17%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in AGG than QQQ.
Type
US Bonds
US Equities
AGG targets investing in US Bonds, while QQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Blackrock (iShares)
Invesco
AGG is managed by Blackrock (iShares), while QQQ is managed by Invesco.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$631,408,505
$17,559,045,883
Both AGG and QQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$91,680,069,240
$197,956,569,440
AGG has more assets under management than QQQ by $106,276,500,200. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
AGG is based off of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while QQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
AGG and QQQ use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
AGG and QQQ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
AGG and QQQ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
QQQ may issue a K1, while AGG does not. You can find non-K1 alternatives for QQQ in its “Related ETFs” section.

Automated Strategies
Related toAGG

#DPE

Diversify with Private Equity

Category

Getting Started, Go Global, Diversification

Risk Rating

Moderate

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.