Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

QQQ vs. IWM

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

QQQ
$--
vs

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWM
$--

Correlation

0.88

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with QQQ:
Compare:
QQQ
Correlation
With:
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88
SwitchQLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares1.00TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares1.00QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF1.00MGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF0.99ONEQFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0.99SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF0.99VUGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Growth ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF0.99VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by QQQ and IWM:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with QQQ
Learn more about IWM
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF

What is QQQ?

Invesco QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Fund will, under most circumstances, consist of all of stocks in the Index. The Index includes 100 of the largest domestic and international nonfinancial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually.

Snapshot
**

QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Inception date
Mar 10 1999
May 22 2000
Expense ratio
0.20%
0.19%
QQQ has a higher expense ratio than IWM by 0.01%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in QQQ than IWM.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
QQQ targets investing in US Equities, while IWM targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Invesco
Blackrock (iShares)
QQQ is managed by Invesco, while IWM is managed by Blackrock (iShares).
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$17,559,045,883
$4,463,198,665
Both QQQ and IWM are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$197,956,569,440
$50,549,436,527
QQQ has more assets under management than IWM by $147,407,132,913. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
Russell 2000 Index
QQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while IWM is based off of the Russell 2000 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
QQQ and IWM use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
QQQ and IWM both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
QQQ and IWM may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
QQQ may issue a K1, while IWM does not. You can find non-K1 alternatives for QQQ in its “Related ETFs” section.
QQQ and IWM’s Correlation
When ETFs are correlated, there are 3 main topics to analyze that will help you build your automated trading strategy: liquidity, expense, and risk.
  • Liquidity: In an active trading strategy (trading multiple time per week), it’s important to consider the liquidity of the ETF you’re using. Lower liquidity can mean more money lost in slippage. AUM and average daily volume are both indicators of liquidity.
  • Expense: Some ETFs are more expensive to use than others. For strategies that are focused on longer holding periods, it’s important to factor in how expensive it is to hold this ETF. Expense ratio is the main indicator of how expensive an ETF is.
  • Risk: Some ETFs will be highly correlated, but have varying degrees of returns, due to leverage. It’s important to consider if an ETF is using leverage or not. The main indicators of a riskier ETF will be the use of leverage and higher standard deviation or max drawdown in a backtest.

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toIWM

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.