Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

QQQ vs. VGT

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

QQQ
$--
vs

Vanguard Information Technology ETF

VGT
$--

Correlation

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with QQQ:
Compare:
QQQ
Correlation
With:
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
SwitchQLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares1.00TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares1.00QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF1.00MGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF0.99ONEQFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0.99SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF0.99VUGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Growth ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF0.99VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

Invest with QQQ
Learn more about VGT
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VGTVanguard Information Technology ETF

What is QQQ?

Invesco QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Fund will, under most circumstances, consist of all of stocks in the Index. The Index includes 100 of the largest domestic and international nonfinancial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually.

Snapshot
**

QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF
Inception date
Mar 10 1999
Jan 26 2004
Expense ratio
0.20%
0.10%
QQQ has a higher expense ratio than VGT by 0.1%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in QQQ than VGT.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
QQQ targets investing in US Equities, while VGT targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Invesco
Vanguard
QQQ is managed by Invesco, while VGT is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$17,559,045,883
$206,920,148
Both QQQ and VGT are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$197,956,569,440
$50,021,727,974
QQQ has more assets under management than VGT by $147,934,841,466. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
QQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while VGT is based off of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
QQQ and VGT use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
QQQ and VGT both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
QQQ and VGT may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
QQQ may issue a K1, while VGT does not. You can find non-K1 alternatives for QQQ in its “Related ETFs” section.

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toVGT

#PTS

Pick the Trending Sector

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.