Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

QQQ vs. VTI

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1

QQQ
$--
vs

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

VTI
$--

Correlation

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with QQQ:
Compare:
QQQ
Correlation
With:
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
SwitchQLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares1.00TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares1.00QQQMInvesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF1.00MGKVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF0.99ONEQFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0.99SCHGSchwab Strategic Trust - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF0.99VUGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Growth ETF0.99IWYBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF0.99IWFBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF0.99VONGVanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF0.99

Top 10 shared holdings

Invest with QQQ
Learn more about VTI
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETF

What is QQQ?

Invesco QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Fund will, under most circumstances, consist of all of stocks in the Index. The Index includes 100 of the largest domestic and international nonfinancial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually.

Snapshot
**

QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Inception date
Mar 10 1999
May 24 2001
Expense ratio
0.20%
0.03%
QQQ has a higher expense ratio than VTI by 0.17%. This can indicate that it’s more expensive to invest in QQQ than VTI.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
QQQ targets investing in US Equities, while VTI targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Invesco
Vanguard
QQQ is managed by Invesco, while VTI is managed by Vanguard.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$17,559,045,883
$607,495,967
Both QQQ and VTI are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$197,956,569,440
$306,403,223,628
QQQ has more assets under management than VTI by $108,446,654,188. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
Nasdaq 100 Index
CRSP US Total Market Index
QQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index, while VTI is based off of the CRSP US Total Market Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
No
QQQ and VTI use the same leverage ratio. Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
QQQ and VTI both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
QQQ and VTI may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
QQQ may issue a K1, while VTI does not. You can find non-K1 alternatives for QQQ in its “Related ETFs” section.

Automated Strategies
Related toQQQ

#BTD

Buy the Dips: Nasdaq 100

Category

Featured, Technology Focus

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toVTI

#WIR

When Inflation is Rising

Category

Living With High Inflation, Worried about Inflation?

Risk Rating

Moderate

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.