Skip to Content
ETF Comparisons

VGT vs. SQQQ

Vanguard Information Technology ETF

VGT
$--
vs

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

SQQQ
$--

Correlation

-0.98

Compare with

Top 10 comparisons with VGT:
Compare:
VGT
Correlation
With:
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-0.98
SwitchFTECFidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF1.00TECLDirexion Shares ETF Trust - Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares1.00XLKSSgA Active Trust - Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF1.00IXNBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Global Tech ETF0.99ROMProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Technology 2x Shares0.99IYWBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares U.S. Technology ETF0.99IGMBlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF0.98TQQQProShares Trust - ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares0.98QLDProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares0.98QQQInvesco Capital Management LLC - Invesco QQQ Trust Series 10.98

Top 10 shared holdings

The top 10 holdings shared by VGT and SQQQ:

There are no shared holdings.
Invest with VGT
Learn more about SQQQ
VGTVanguard Information Technology ETF
SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

What is VGT?

Seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of stocks in the information technology sector. Passively managed using a full-replication strategy when possible and a sampling strategy if regulatory constraints dictate. Includes stocks of companies that serve the electronics and computer industries or that manufacture products based on the latest applied science.

Snapshot
**

VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
Inception date
Jan 26 2004
Feb 09 2010
Expense ratio
0.10%
0.95%
VGT has a lower expense ratio than SQQQ by 0.85%. This can indicate that it’s cheaper to invest in VGT than SQQQ.
Type
US Equities
US Equities
VGT targets investing in US Equities, while SQQQ targets investing in US Equities.
Fund owner
Vanguard
ProShares
VGT is managed by Vanguard, while SQQQ is managed by ProShares.
Volume (1m avg. daily)
$206,920,148
$2,217,551,125
Both VGT and SQQQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets.
AUM
$50,021,727,974
$4,455,851,279
VGT has more assets under management than SQQQ by $45,565,876,695. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading.
Associated index
MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index
Nasdaq 100 Index
VGT is based off of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Transition Index, while SQQQ is based off of the Nasdaq 100 Index
Inverse/Leveraged
No
Inverse (-3x)
VGT uses undefined, while SQQQ uses Inverse (-3x). Inverse and leveraged ETFs can be used to either take an opposite position or amplify returns of a given index.
Passive/Active
Passive
Passive
VGT and SQQQ both use a Passive investing strategy. In an actively managed fund, the fund manager makes decisions about how funds are invested. A passively managed fund typically tries to track or follow a market index.
Dividend
No
No
VGT and SQQQ may offer dividends. The frequency and yield of the dividend may not be the same.
Prospectus
View
View
Neither VGT nor SQQQ require a K1.
When ETFs are inversely correlated, they can be used in actively traded strategies (multiple trades per week) to take positions in opposing directions. For example, if you believe VGT is going to fall, it would make sense to invest in SQQQ, as based on historical data, when VGT decreases in value, SQQQ tends to increase in value.

Automated Strategies
Related toVGT

#PTS

Pick the Trending Sector

Category

Grow Your Portfolio, Ride the Momentum

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Automated Strategies
Related toSQQQ

#SPYMIN

SPY minimum drawdown

Category

Community

Risk Rating

Aggressive

Create your own algorithmic
trading strategy

Disclaimers

*

We show information directly obtained from our data provider, Xignite. Data shown here is provided by Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes the information shown here is reliable, but has not been verified and there is no guarantee that the information is accurate.

**

We show information based on calculations performed by Composer using data from our provider. Information provided here is based on calculations performed by Composer using data sourced from Xignite, an unaffiliated third party. Composer believes this information is reliable, but has not verified the data and there is no guarantee that the calculations are accurate.